Trésor-Info - Publications de la direction générale du Trésor - United-Kingdom

Lessons from Past Industrial Policies

2025-02-13T00:00:00+01:00

Industrial policies aimed at the creation and development of specific sectors have made a comeback against a backdrop of a mounting number of crises, trade tensions, an accelerating innovation race and the imperative of combating climate change (see Chart on cover page). A study of policies in eight advanced and catching-up countries from 1945 to 2000 provides useful insight into the conditions determining their success or failure.

Industrial policy had similar aims in all countries studied: (i) growth and competitiveness; (ii) support for major transitions (energy, space, etc.); (iii) strategic autonomy and sovereignty; and (iv) support for declining sectors.

Although different models of industrial policy exist, most countries have intervened in a targeted manner in specific sectors. The catching-up countries (Japan followed by South Korea and China), France and the United Kingdom – up to the 1980s – directly intervened in the development of industrial production capacities. In the United States, sector measures were decentralised and limited to R&D support and government procurement in military and high value-added sectors.

The advanced countries’ sector-specific measures focused on emerging sectors with high stakes in defence- and sovereignty (aviation, energy and space in the post-war period followed, as in the catching-up countries, by electronics and IT). The catching-up countries initially focused on mature, but high-growth-potential mid-tech sectors (automobiles, chemicals and shipbuilding) and then on high-tech sectors (primarily electronics and IT).

International sector-specific industrial policy experiences provide useful insight for shaping today’s policies. For example, the success of both export aid conditional on performance in South Korea and the precise specification of ambitious technological goals in US development contracts suggests that setting high commercial and technological performance targets is a factor for success.

The Impact of Brexit on the United Kingdom's Economy

2024-04-30T00:00:00+02:00

The United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union (EU), which was voted for by referendum in June 2016, became effective on 31 January 2020. After a transition period, the UK left the single market on 1 January 2021. Brexit has had an impact on the United Kingdom’s economy and has dampened its growth potential through three main channels.

Firstly, owing to the reintroduction of non-tariff barriers, the UK’s trade in goods with the EU fell in 2021 to a greater extent than trade with non-EU countries, although the impact only seems to have been temporary. On the other hand, trade in services with the EU has been more lastingly affected, especially for financial and transportation services.

Secondly, business investment in most sectors has stalled since the 2016 referendum following a period of strong growth. Due to the effects of both Brexit and the COVID-19 pandemic, in Q2 2023, it was more than 20% below the level that it would have reached had it maintained the momentum seen between Q1 2010 and Q2 2016 (see Chart).

Lastly, restrictions on the employment of EU nationals have reduced the labour supply at a time when the UK’s labour market is under great strain. Employment of EU workers has levelled off since 2016 whereas it had rocketed during the years prior to the referendum. This has forced British employers to have greater recourse to non-European labour.

The Market for Safe Assets

2023-08-29T00:00:00+02:00

The holding of so-called “safe” assets, and the market for these securities more broadly, play a key role in maintaining financial stability. Yet there is no consensus as to how these assets are defined because the “safety” of a security depends on a number of different characteristics such as its stability, counter-cyclicality and liquidity, how transparently it is valued, and how solid its fundamentals are. The relative importance of these aspects varies according to investor preferences and financial-market conditions.

By examining how different asset classes perform against different safety criteria, it is possible to identify a universe of assets that can be considered “safe”, and to analyse developments in the market for these assets over the past two decades.

The supply of safe assets grew sharply in the 2010s, owing in part to sovereign bond issues. However, these assets became less readily available as central banks, especially in Europe, embarked on bond-buying programmes as part of a broader package of unconventional monetary policy measures. Despite increased supply, safe assets remained hard to come by throughout this period, as demand surged in both Europe and the United States, owing largely to the introduction of tighter prudential requirements in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis.

Globally, the market imbalance caused by these opposing forces has been partly redressed since the COVID-19 crisis of 2020, owing in large part to sovereign debt issues intended to fund pandemic support packages, which have had the effect of bringing the supply of safe assets into closer alignment with demand.

Looking ahead, the market could be affected by a number of major structural trends. Factors that could impact supply include the reshaping of the safe assets landscape amid the green transition, debt sustainability issues, rating downgrades and reform of the international monetary system. Meanwhile, demand could be influenced by developments such as the roll-back of unconventional monetary policy measures and changes to regulatory standards, especially those relating to non-bank financial institutions (NBFIs).