The Swiss High-Price Island

2026-01-22T00:00:00+01:00

Switzerland has a reputation for being a particularly expensive country. The GDP price index is roughly 60% higher than the European Union (EU) average, creating what is known as a “high-price island”. This high cost of living affects consumption more than investment, and, within consumption, affects services more than goods.

The high-price island was not caused by recent inflation but rather structural factors dating back to the 1970s. It goes hand in hand with wages that are approximately the double of those in neighbouring countries. Above all, high price levels in Switzerland reveal a dichotomy in its economy.

While one section of the Swiss economy is heavily outward-facing, and its very high level of productivity has resulted in high wages, another section is focused on the domestic market, particularly the service sector, where there is little competition. To match the high wages in the competitive tradable sector, the less productive domestic sector has to raise its wages, resulting in a rise in the overall prices.

The Swiss model openly prioritises producers over consumers with an eye to promoting Switzerland’s economic and industrial position. The result is that certain sections of the economy are relatively closed off, with high levels of agricultural protectionism and a less demanding competition policy than the one underpinning the EU.

High income levels allow most of the Swiss population to benefit from very strong purchasing power. While Switzerland is certainly a high-price island, it is first and foremost an island of prosperity, driven by the success of its exports. Paradoxically, there is a lingering doubt as to whether this model is sustainable (i) without the continued support of targeted protection schemes and (ii) lower domestic competition.

Minerals in the Energy Transition

2024-10-24T00:00:00+02:00

The energy transition is expected to involve use of mineral-intensive technologies, with high demand for certain so-called “critical” or “strategic” minerals such as lithium, graphite, nickel, manganese, silicon, rare-earth elements and copper.

In the short term, the global supply of critical minerals appears to be sufficient to meet the new uses related to the energy transition. Lithium and nickel prices have been falling since early 2023 against the backdrop of a sharp uptick in Chinese production and slowdown in global demand. Production nevertheless remains highly geographically concentrated, with a handful of countries holding a monopoly over the extraction of key critical minerals, and China now dominating refining and processing for the majority of these minerals.

Global demand could more than triple between now and 2050 in order to meet international and domestic environmental targets (see Chart below), with this spike in demand far exceeding current production levels for lithium, graphite and cobalt. Although many mineral-producing countries are eager to capitalise on their resources, the possibility of shortages cannot be ruled out – not least because the current low-price environment is weighing on the anticipated profitability of investments and new production sites, potentially leading to projects being postponed.

Many governments have responded to these risks, and to mounting geopolitical tensions, by introducing policies to secure and diversify supplies of critical minerals. At the same time, recent years have seen a sharp increase in trade barriers affecting these minerals, largely as a result of positioning strategies further down the value chain.

Trésor-Info - Publications de la direction générale du Trésor - Prices

The Swiss High-Price Island

Minerals in the Energy Transition